beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.10.04 2018고단50

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of 2018 is a person who is engaged in the operation of Crocketing taxi.

On December 25, 2017, the Defendant continued to turn to the left from the nearest distance of the E Hospital located in D, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, to the left distance of the court.

It is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by accurately manipulating the steering side and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front portion of GK5 si in the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle at the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant’s negligence in contravention of the signal, from the direction of the right side to the Do Office from the edge of the Do Office.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim F, such as a dynasium that intrudes about 6 weeks of crynasium, and the injury to the hynasium that requires approximately 4 weeks of treatment to the victim H (19 years of age), and the injury to the victim I (18 years of age), who is the passenger of the Defendant taxi, suffered approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim I (18 years of age) who is a victim of the taxi, respectively.

The defendant of "2018 Godan 1588" is a person who is engaged in the operation of J rocketing taxi.

On June 8, 2018, the Defendant, around 00:05, proceeded from the terminal side of the cross-city bus to the intersection distance of the “L” restaurant located in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Chungcheongnam-gu.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to live well on the front side of the person engaged in driving of the vehicle, to observe the signal, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and the direction of the defendant's proceeding.