beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.05.01 2014노750

상해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case on the ground that it is difficult to see that D intentionally harming the Defendant in order to secure favorable status in civil procedure and made a false accusation against the Defendant, in light of various circumstances, the victim’s statement that the Defendant suffered bodily injury against the Defendant is reliable in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. On February 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 20:45, at the second floor lecture room of “EADA” operated by the complainant in Busan Shipping Daegu (55 years of age); (b) while disputing the issue of return of down payment due to the destruction of D and lease agreement, the Defendant was in excess of the time when he was on the part of the chest of D’s chest due to the destruction of D and lease agreement; and (c) on the part of the following, the Defendant got off the body of D, which has come up to a number of times, to walk the body of D with about three weeks, and led the following vehicles to a d's d's d's c's c's s

3. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: D, with respect to the course, method, etc., of the instant injury, “the Defendant was able to communicate with D and F, and each other was high; D, intending to prevent F, while speaking as “Fraud;” D, the Defendant opened the lecture room and opened the lecture room; and F, the Defendant was able to purchase D’s drinking water; and the Defendant was able to d’s drinking water; the Defendant was able to d’s drinking water; and the upper part was towed to the upper part of D’s lecture while towing d’s upper part to the upper part of D’s upper part of D’s back to 2 to 3 times; the Defendant was able to d’s left part of D’s upper part; and the Defendant was able to take part in D’s front part of D’s front part after getting off his head after getting off and cutting off his head; and then, she was able to open the lecture room at the entrance of D’s entrance.

After that, the defendant tried not to go back to D, and the F tried to open the lecture room after hearing D's lusium and trying to open the lecture room.