A. On May 1, 1969, while working for Pungcheon Trade Co., Ltd. in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Plaintiff A was arrested on May 1, 1969 by the Central Information Department investigator belonging to the Defendant without a warrant of violation of the National Security Act, and on June 11, 1969, after being detained under a warrant issued on May 6, 1969, the Seoul Criminal District Court under the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office (hereinafter “instant charges”) issued by the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office in accordance with the attached Form 2 (hereinafter “instant charges”).

(2) On November 3, 1969, the above court convicted the Plaintiff A of all the charges of this case, and sentenced the Plaintiff A to 7 years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification.

(2) The court below's judgment prior to the retrial was reversed on March 4, 1970, and the court below reversed the judgment of the court below prior to the retrial on March 4, 1970, and rendered a not-guilty verdict as to "A received 200 U.S. dollars from each of the J guidance members on January 12, 1967 and April 20, 1967" and sentenced the remaining facts charged to five years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification.

(2) On July 3, 1970, the final appeal filed by the Plaintiff A to the Supreme Court 70Do949, but the final appeal was dismissed on July 3, 1970, which became final and conclusive.

3) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff A released the Plaintiff on parole on December 25, 1973, when the enforcement of the sentence was in progress. (B) On the other hand, the Committee for the Settlement of History established under the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth and the Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth and Reconciliation of the

Around October 2009, the Central Information Board conducted an illegal investigation by the adviser and cruel act while illegally detained the plaintiff A without a warrant, and received the confession of the plaintiff A. The evidence was collected through such illegal investigation.