However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 02:10 on April 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated that “mastk is dwarfed, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find; (b) the Defendant requested the Defendant to return home from E in the front of the C convenience point in Yangsan-si; and (c) stated that “I find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find by the victim’s body,” and that “I find the victim’s body find,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 notification processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to attach field rents and CCTV images);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of suspended sentence is based on the following factors: (a) the background leading up to the instant crime; (b) the attitude of assault and obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) the degree of the offender’s punishment against the Defendant; and (d) the injured public official does not want such punishment against the Defendant; and (d) the