However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2015. 3. 23. 00:55경 시흥시 D에 있는 E 식당에서 술에 취한 채 음식 값을 계산하지 않던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 시흥경찰서 F지구대 순찰3팀 소속 경찰공무원인 피해자 B에게 “씨발새끼야, 왜 그래서, 뭐 뭘 그렇게 쳐다봐, 어쩔건데, 경찰이면 다야, 씨발새끼야, 좆같은 새끼야. 너 좆은 달려있냐”라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. When the victim C, a police officer belonging to the F District patrol Team of the Silung Police Station, who received a report at the above date, time, and place, was forced to be informed of the victim’s resistance, such as her laging “Isle,” and her laging the victim’s lag, such as her laging the victim’s lag, and her laging the victim’s lag, then the victim’s left face was at one time due to her laf.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to 112 report processing duties, and at the same time, the victim was suffering from snow grass and gymp around snow that require treatment for about two weeks.

3. In the process of causing property damage to the victim C, such as the date and time set forth in paragraph 2 at the above time and place, the Defendant: (a) caused the scambling by making the scambling of the scam used by the victim to fall on the floor

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's inside of the scope of the repair cost to be equivalent to KRW 60,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and B;

1. G statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: