beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고단6249

사기등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. on November 12, 2015, and Defendant D appealed after being sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the same court on the same day, respectively, and is currently in the appellate trial.

Defendant

A is a person who has operated an office for soliciting the general head of Tong on the first floor of the building located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant D is a person who has worked in the above office as a telecomter.

Defendant

A From around 2007, it delivers to Defendant D personal information, such as the name, age, gender, and telephone number of unspecified persons acquired by running a loan brokerage business, and Defendant D opened a passbook with the phone number stated in the above personal information as if he could make a substitute loan by telephone, and then delivers it to the singing organization, and the singing staff continued to commit a telephone financing fraud using the above passbook.

1. Violation of the Act on Fraud and Electronic Financial Transactions;

A. According to the foregoing mother’s intent to commit the crime against the victim AX, Defendant D calls at the above office around May 20, 2015 with the victim’s cell phone number delivered by Defendant A and then provides loans to the low interest.

In order to do this, false statements were made to the effect that the false performance should be accumulated through the repetition of entrance fees, and that the account number and password of the physical card should be informed, and that the physical card should immediately be contacted with another number, and that it should be sent as known in the face.

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to get the victim to get the loan by using the check with the body card from the victim.

On May 21, 2015, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim communicate the physical card connected to the account in the name of one bank (AY) to the victim, using Kwikwikset Service.