If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 2010, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that D had intended to operate a gambling house at the house B B 401, the Defendant: (b) provided D with a 100,000 won per capita with a 52 card, and (c) selected a card to replace each 4 with a 52 card; and (d) operated a string and a string for approximately 330 hours by taking advantage of the 52 card; and (d) aided and abetted D with a 330-hour term “abscam,” during around 11 hours, so as to be used for gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the main sentence of Article 246 (1) and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;