2. Although the necessity of a strict order to interfere with the execution of official duties is recognized in light of the police's summons in the field of living at a living room, considering the following circumstances: (a) although the defendant's assault of this case was insignificant and there was no history of punishment; (b) although the defendant argued in the lower court, it is difficult to regard the defendant as a ground for the determination of legal assessment rather than denying clear facts; (c) the defendant's age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment; (d) the defendant's age, character, intelligence and environment; (e) the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; and (e) the method and method of the crime, etc., as the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, the prosecutor's allegation above is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.