If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2014. 8. 13. 02:49경 포항 북구 C에 있는 ‘D 편의점’ 출입문 앞에서, 술에 취해 그곳에 누워 있는 피고인 때문에 편의점 문을 닫을 수 없다는 취지의 신고를 받고 출동한 포항북부경찰서 E파출소 소속 경위 F이 피고인을 깨워 귀가를 종용하였다는 이유로 위 F에게 “경찰 이 개새끼, 십새끼”라고 욕설을 하면서 발로 F의 왼쪽 다리를 2회 찼다.

피고인은 계속하여 F이 누워 있는 피고인을 일으켜 세우려고 하자 발로 F의 배 부분을 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Code of the relevant criminal facts, the choice of a fine (the defendant asserts that he/she was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder because he/she had no memory under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. Thus, according to the statement of the police statement about F on the statement of the police statement about the crime in this case, even though he/she was aware that he/she had drinking a little amount of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case, it cannot be deemed that he/she had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the defendant's above assertion

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;