먹는물관리법위반
Defendants are not guilty.
1. Defendant A, from around July 2008, worked as the head of the Central Bio-Research Institute G G GGG head from the point of view of Namyang-si, who is an employee of the above GG branch. Defendant A, as the head of the IG head of the GG head of the GG branch from April 2009, is an employee of the above GG branch; Defendant B, as the head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG head of the GG branch, responsible for water quality inspection under the GG head of the GG head of the GG, who is in charge of water quality inspection under the GG head of the G.
Defendant
A around December 4, 2015, upon request by a person under the Food Water Management Act for the raw water and the number of products of spring water from the above white beverage, Defendant B, who is subject to the quality inspection item, “it is impossible to visit and take the white beverage due to personal circumstances, and send the result by conducting a total fump test with the number of products produced in the white beverage that is sold in the city.
Defendant B agreed thereto.
Accordingly, Defendant A, on December 4, 2015, without collecting water quality samples from the heading of the raw water of Gyeonggi-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-si, stated six samples (five raw water of spring water and one product number) as if Defendant A visited the above White-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-si and then requested water quality testing to the water quality analysis team.