대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) upon the introduction of C, the Plaintiff agreed to provide KRW 5.8 million for each five million loan to the Defendant, KRW 5.8 million on July 10, 2012; (b) KRW 20 million on July 19, 2012; (c) KRW 10 million on August 21, 2012; (d) KRW 10 million on September 7, 2012; and (e) KRW 5.5 million on September 11, 2012; and (e) between the Defendant and the Defendant to receive KRW 5.8 million on a ten-day basis at a ten-day rate; and (e) the Defendant agreed to have the remainder of KRW 48 million on a one-time loan to the Plaintiff (i.e., KRW 5., KRW 7 million on a ten-day basis).
2. The following circumstances, i.e., Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1 through 3, and the overall purport of arguments, i.e., "the defendant's son at the Gwangju District Court on June 24, 2013," stated "the defendant's son at C, at KRW 20 million on July 19, 2012, at KRW 10 million on August 21, 2012, and KRW 10 million on September 7, 2012, and KRW 20 million on September 11, 2012, and KRW 20 million on September 11, 2012, and KRW 20,000,000 on September 24, 201, the plaintiff's claim for loans at KRW 30,000,000,000 on June 24, 201." The plaintiff's claim for loans at KRW 300,000.