except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On January 9, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B, drafted “Seoul City E2F,” “Seoul City E2F,” “W million won in the deposit column,” “Seoul City E, F, and “G Licensed Real Estate Agent H” in the lessor column, and exercised the lease contract under the name of F and H, which are private documents on the forged rights and obligations on which F and H’s seal are affixed, and the lease contract under the name of H was duly concluded.

B. On April 5, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B, prepared “Seoul Dobong-gu E (2F), “Seoul City E(20 million won),” “Seoul-gu E, E, F”, and “G Licensed Real Estate Agent H in the broker column” in the column for indicating real estate at the office of the first floor of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 179-4 Slives Loan Office for the first floor of the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a private document on rights and obligations on which F and H seal are affixed, and exercised the lease contract in the name of F and H as if it were duly formed.

2. Fraud;

A. On January 9, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B, requested the victim D to grant a loan under the name of B on January 9, 2012, the Defendant would pay the remainder of the lease deposit amounting to KRW 60 million and KRW 900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

However, the actual lease deposit of the defendant was only five million won, and the lease contract was forged.

The defendant, in collusion with B, deceives the victim and is subject to such deception.