A. Defendant Jeju 4.3 Victims’ Bereaved Family Association (hereinafter “Defendant organization”) is an unincorporated association established on October 30, 198 by consisting of some of the bereaved families of the victims of the Jeju 4.3 Incident and Defendant B is C of the Defendant organization for the purpose of various projects, etc. to restore their legal and institutional honor to those who have sacrificed on the Jeju 4.3 Incident.

B. At around 14:00 on September 2, 2013, the Plaintiff, a representative of the Internet “D organization, attended a seminars on the issue of designation of the 20th floor of the Seoul Press Center at the 20th international conference hall (hereinafter “instant seminars”) and made a personnel statement, and the full text of the personnel statement is as shown in the attached Form.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant’s organization announced on the contrary to the designation of the 4.3 Memorial Year, a statement of the name of the corresponding dynamics of the Raw-man, “Do residents,” and the name of the title called “Do residents,” which reads the network. The main content is to fill up the Plaintiff’s remuneration personnel’s holding the seminars in this case and opposing the designation of the 4.3 memorial day. The name is that “A (the Plaintiff) as the president of the Do organization, who is the head of the Jeju-do organization, is greater.

‘4.3Special Act and 4.3 Government Reports saw as '4.3' of Article 2-4.3, and as '80% of Do residents' alleged as 'Do residents 80% as soon as possible', the column must suppress.

If the officer-military forces are not dispatched, the officer-military forces shall leave the soldiers and suppress the insurrection.

The term "ise" expressed as a "ise".

"The content was included".

On the other hand, the above name was written by Defendant B, C, the Defendant’s organization.

On the same day, Jeju-do Residents' Day, Jeju-do Residents' Day, etc. reported the above contents of the statement to the defendant's organization.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion shall attend the seminars of this case and 80% of the residents of Jeju-do as soon as possible and shall suppress the disturbance.