도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 01:30 on February 15, 2012, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.142%, the Defendant driven the feling car at a section of approximately 1.5 km from the parking lot of the new apartment located in the Sinpo-si Sin Sinpo-si to the front road of the new pharmacy located in the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant driven the feling car at a section of approximately 1.5 km from the front road of the new pharmacy located in the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant driven the said feling car at a section of approximately 1 km from the front road of the new pharmacy located in the Sinpo-dong, Sinpo-si.
2. Around 01:30 on February 15, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (under the influence of alcohol by 0.142% on the blood alcohol concentration, the Defendant was driving the said maternal passenger vehicle at a speed of 0.142% on the side of the new apartment, leading the road in front of the Gyeongdong post office, which is located at a speed of Fagpo-si calculation.
Since there are two-lanes of roads in which the central salary is installed in the center, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.
The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and did not stop immediately and left the site without taking necessary measures, even though the Defendant damaged the center 140,000 won installed at the center of the road with the left part of the motor vehicle driving ahead of the frighting car.
3. At around 05:00 on February 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for drunk driving as indicated in paragraph (1); and (b) presented the Defendant’s resident registration certificate of E (F) in his possession as if he were the Defendant’s resident registration certificate; and (c) denied the Defendant’s resident registration certificate of E in his name in a wooden market.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on detection of a host driver;
1. The actual survey report and evidence photograph;
1. Resident registration certificates (E);