F. According to the purport of Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 8 and the argument that the plaintiff paid the employment insurance premium on behalf of the defendant, since the plaintiff did not pay it, the amount equivalent to the employment insurance premium should be deducted from the subcontract price that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff. 2) According to the purport of Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 8 and all arguments, it is recognized that the plaintiff subscribed to the employment insurance under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes for the civil engineering work among the long-term care hospital construction of this case and officetels, and that the amount of insurance premium under the above Acts and subordinate statutes was determined as being paid. The above amount equivalent to the employment insurance premium should be deducted from the subcontract price of this case x 1.5% x the total amount of remuneration x the employment insurance premium x the total amount of remuneration x the non-regular construction cost x 0.1.5% (the total amount of remuneration x the amount equivalent to the employment insurance premium of this case x the amount equivalent to the employment insurance premium of 000 won x 1.5% (the amount equivalent to the employment insurance premium of this case) x 0000.40%).

hereinafter the same shall apply);

As to the construction of the instant officetel, KRW 2,185,500 = 2,185,000 =