손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 21,497,623 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from May 17, 2016 to February 15, 2019.
1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings on the images of Gap evidence Nos. 10, 12, Eul evidence No. 1-1, 2-2, Eul evidence No. 2-1, 2-3, and evidence No. 111.
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, etc., using the night-time zone at the time of the weekend, to conduct a motor vehicle racing called “rawing” in the so-called “scoping projecting”, the world’s largest light width tunnel of four-lanes in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city, or the vehicle of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the 10 meters.
At the same time, an electronic sign board of traffic guidance attached to the tent of the straight line of the tunnel, which is speeded at the same time until the end of the straight line in the tunnel, led to a speed of approximately KRW 250-300 km per hour from the 2.4km section of the tunnel to the point where the straight line in the tunnel is completed, and it first arrives at the point where the above hosting section ends or at a distance of more than a certain distance is to be decided on the winning box.
B. Accordingly, around 02:00 on May 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) drive CMW M6 car (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”); (b) the Plaintiff was carrying female-child Nonparty D on the steering force; and (c) drive the EWW 63C car (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).