For reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment dismissing the instant prosecution on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the Defendant’s act of entering the center line and the safety zone was a direct cause for the occurrence of the instant accident.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on “the violation of instructions expressed by the Central Line” or “the violation

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.