When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 09:05 on June 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) explained to the electorate that the Defendant was subject to search and seizure on the grounds of the suspicion of the violation of the Public Official Election Act at the 6th nationwide E-Si/Gun Election Act; (b) explained to the electorate that the victim G (ma, 43 years old) discovered it was waiting for the police, and subsequently prevented the Defendant from going ahead; (c) stated that “I will go against the victim’s chest. I are considered to be subject to the principle of tax law and the principle of tax law and the principle of tax law and the principle of tax law and the rule of law and the rule of law and the rule of law and the rule of law and the rule of law and the rule of law and the rule of law.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;