However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 18, 2014, at around 16:18, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the police officer of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station B District, who was dispatched to the police officer of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station B District, and received a notification from the police officer of the police officer of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station B, to the effect that he/she had a person who was suffering from trial costs on the platform in the south of 77:0,00 Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties by assaulting C, “I wish to confirm his/her identity during the franch, I wish to die his/her franch,” by threatening C, “I want to die his/her franch, I want to die his/her mother.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties) (the scope of the sentencing guidelines];

2. The punishment of a police officer who is in the course of performing a decision-making on sentence of a punishment is not minor, the punishment records are several times, the violation against a defendant, the age and character of the defendant, and all of the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the punishment records;