근로자퇴직급여보장법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: “The Defendant, as the representative of the Daegu-gu Seoul-gu Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., employs eight full-time workers and operates the printing advertising design business. From August 23, 2010 to December 20, 2019, retired workers D’s extension allowances of KRW 1,734,830, totaling KRW 418,950, totaling the annual non-permanent leave allowances of KRW 182,40,00, totaling the annual non-permanent leave allowances of KRW 182,40,180, and KRW 32,585,663, and operated the printing advertising design business.” Thus, according to Article 109(1), Article 36, and Article 465 of the Labor Standards Act and Article 24 of the Labor Standards Act, the victim cannot be dismissed under the proviso to Article 29(1) of the Labor Standards Act or the proviso to Article 40(2) of the Act.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.