However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C around May 2007. A

On July 10, 2012, at around 00 00:00, the Defendant sent to a room in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, one-time sexual intercourse with B, in which it is impossible to know the protection room of the Eel.

B. On July 13, 2012, at around 07:00, the Defendant sent to a room where the head of the Gelel located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City F was unable to know, with a single sexual intercourse with B.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and had sexual intercourses with A twice at the time, time, and place referred to in paragraph (1) and (b) as above, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Defendants concerning the interrogation of suspects

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including circumstances leading to this case) or more;