However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

From May 2013 to April 2014, the Defendant was serving as an employee in the “Dart” operated by the victim C in Yangsan City, and the employees left office and did not correct the office after the lapse of 8:30 minutes at night. On the accounting books, the Defendant knew that there is a key to the cash storage on the cash storage and that there is a separate storage.

On June 16, 2014, at around 21:10, the Defendant 10,000 won of the cash owned by the victim was placed in a closed bank and stolen it by putting the examination-related plastic sealing paper prepared in advance to keep the CCTV face from being exposed to the CCTV into the head and breaking it into the Mat Underground Office through an unrecepted door, and opening the warehouse door into the cash storage key on the accounting book, and 1.1 million won of the cash owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Although the nature of the crime committed by the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is poor, the defendant is an initial criminal without criminal records, and the degree of damage is not much severe, it is so decided as per Disposition.