손해배상(기)
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is from February 13, 2016 to October 13, 2016 to KRW 300,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff provided assistance by introducing customers to the Defendant working for an insurance company, and the Defendant lent money of KRW 170 million necessary to establish a coffee specialty.
Since then, the Plaintiff repeatedly sent text messages that cause fears or apprehensions as shown in the Defendant’s cell phone from June 12, 2015 to June 14:23:46 to June 18, 2015, on the ground that the Defendant did not take any delivery, and received notification under Article 32(1)41 (s) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act by repeatedly sending text messages that cause fears or apprehensions as shown in the Defendant’s separate sheet.
B. On June 18, 2015, the police officer of the pressure patrol box received a report of 112 telephone call from E, a motionee, which the Plaintiff is going to use force against the Defendant at the parking lot adjacent to the “D” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, and arrested the Plaintiff as an indecent act by compulsion, after hearing the statement that “the Plaintiff was forced by the Defendant with sexual intercourse with the Defendant and forced by force to take the Defendant’s hand, and forced by force to contact or induce the Defendant’s chest,” and arrested the Plaintiff as an indecent act by force.
C. On June 18, 2015, the Defendant prepared a written statement at the police station that “The Plaintiff resisted sexual assault against the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff saw the Defendant’s knife and sold the Defendant’s knife, the Plaintiff knife and knife the Defendant’s knife several times at the Defendant’s home, and the Plaintiff dnife the first race, and applied for strong punishment since 40-50 telephone and intimidation a day.” On June 26, 2015, the Defendant was present at the Seoul Gangnam Police Station at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Police Station and called as a parking lot on June 18, 2015, and the Plaintiff tried to take knife the knife in order to prevent the Plaintiff from getting off the knife from getting off the knife, and the Plaintiff did not have any knife the knife on the knife.
The plaintiff is followed to get back the key.