beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2012.12.28 2012고정228

상해

Text

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

B. Defendant A did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around April 15, 2012, around 07:20 on April 15, 2012, around F, and around 07:20, during the process of dispute with the victim B (n, 53 years of age), damaged the victim, such as francing bomb, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B and G;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Investigation report (No. 60 to 62 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (investigative records No. 28 pages);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Division of a crime under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) of the provisional payment order;

1. Around 07:20 on April 15, 2012, Defendant B 2 spited the part of the victim H (the age of 67) with a stick, which was found in his/her hand, in order to resisting that part of the Defendant’s discussion was invaded by the “F” in the “F” located in the “F,” and the “F,” and the “F,” in order to look at the part of the Defendant’s debate.

On the ground that the victim A(the 62 years of age) was sprinking and sprinking the Defendant's hand, the Defendant continued to sprinked A's bat, and spacked the Defendant's bat, etc. on the inside.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim H such as the old satis, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim A such as the satis, which requires approximately one week of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant did not have inflicted an injury on the victims as stated in the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court, and there is only a fact that he took clothes of the victims in order to dump, or not to go beyond the floor, in a state where the body can not be properly divided due to the left-hand part of the case.