beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.02.07 2018가단51471

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,814,162 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from September 19, 2016 to February 7, 2020.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person who operates a D Hospital in Ansan-si Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On July 1, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of the cryp and the radioactive source, and applied it to the Defendant Hospital.

The medical staff of the defendant hospital confirmed the opinions of the 4-5 main sentence and the 5-astronomical nuclear escape, as a result of the implementation of the TRI test on the plaintiff.

C. On July 6, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was discharged from the hospital on July 9, 2016, when the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital due to the implementation of the neutological surgery.

After that, the Plaintiff received preservation treatment, and the left-hand macker, and the left-hand macker was conducted on September 19, 2016 at the Defendant Hospital with high-frequency heat treatment in the 4-5 side.

(hereinafter “instant procedure”). D.

After the instant medical procedure, the Plaintiff started to saw, rupture, etc. from September 22, 2016, and accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital improved the antibiotical system.

However, the Plaintiff continued to appeal the heat and doubles, and around that time, the Plaintiff expressed its opinions on the injury by CRP (4.65mg/dL).

E. After October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff transferred to E Hospital on November 1, 2016, considering the view of farming in the area of the part of the procedure, as a result of the RoI’s test on October 31, 2016. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as the pel Hospital’s 4-5 catitis, and was subject to the examination on the pelI’s catitis and the satisfic therapy.

F. Meanwhile, a doctor G, who carried out the instant medical treatment in the record of the medical compensation mutual aid case that the Defendant submitted to the FFFFF, stated to the effect that “I think that there exists a causal link with the negligence and accident on the part of the Defendant hospital, as presumed to have been caused by the spawn infection of the medical institution used in the instant medical treatment.”

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsured Facts, entry of Gap 1 through 12 evidence, results of response to request for appraisal of medical records by the President of the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency of this Court, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) doctors;