beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.10.17 2013고단323

업무방해

Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: G ready-mixed vehicles, etc. under FF’s management supervision of the management division E of D Co., Ltd., a contractor of Section 2 of the said construction work, attempted to get out of the construction site, in the case of C construction site located in Seogpo City B around November 15, 2012, 209:0.

At this time, the Defendant, along with H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U,V, and W, from 09:09 to 09:12 on the same day, 3 minutes from 14:12 on the same day to 14:31 on the same day, 11 minutes from 16:11 on the same day to 16:22 on the same day, and 18 minutes from 17:25 on the same day from 17:43 on the road at the entrance of the project site at the site of the construction site, thereby preventing vehicles in the construction site from leaving the construction site.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collaboration with the above H, obstructed the construction work of a private victim D corporation by making it difficult to operate a construction vehicle, such as a construction vehicle with approximately 51 minutes of bit 51 minutes by force.

"2013 Highest 991"

A. On September 24, 2012, around 17:02, at the construction site located in Seopopo City B, the victim (ju) who is a partner company under the control of the victim X (ju) who is the contractor for the construction of the said construction work, was conducting the production for the establishment and implementation of the construction plan, and the construction vehicle, such as ready-mixed, intended to enter the construction site for concrete building theory necessary for the work.

At this time, the Defendant, along with P, J, Z, R, etc. from 17:24 on the same day to 17:2 minutes from 18:29 on the same day, and from 18:41 on the same day to 12 minutes at the entrance of the Category C Bureau, 12 minutes of the same day, interfered with construction vehicles from leaving the construction site by means of buttert.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with the above P, made it difficult to operate construction vehicles, such as a 34-minuted vehicle by force, thereby obstructing the construction work of the victim X (ju) and Y, a partner company.

B. On September 25, 2012, the victim who is a contractor of the said construction work at the construction site C located in Seopo-si B, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.