beta
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.11.25 2020가단5503

구상금

Text

Defendant B’s KRW 12,813,97, Defendant C, and D respectively, KRW 5,125,59, Defendant E, F, and G, respectively, and KRW 2,562,79.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendants were convicted on September 17, 2015 of the following criminal facts:

(C) In order to enhance the lessee’s credit, Defendant A is a person who prepares a basic document for loan of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease.

The Defendants, with the knowledge that the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport provides a loan to the low-income group through a bank at the city, share each role in the preparation of documents that play a role in enhancing the credit worthiness of false lessees, bank services and loan brokerage measures in charge of loan-related affairs, false lessors who own a house but do not have the intention or ability to repay the loan even if they receive a loan, and want to use the loan after deceiving the staff in charge of the bank and receiving the loan.

Defendant

A around the end of July 2013, after introducing Defendant F, Defendant G, and Defendant C, the owner of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan L Building, and Defendant C, the owner of the M, Defendant E, the false tenant he recruited, Defendant B was subject to the house lease loan, such as a false certificate of employment.