업무방해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: the Defendant received the request from the number of women belonging to AI, which is affiliated with the Incheon Women's Capital Association (hereinafter referred to as "maths") at the time of the instant case; when the number is cut up to 153 times, he was able to use microphones, and he was seated next to that time when the number is cut off, and he was able to remain silent. Thus, such act of the Defendant does not constitute "the force" under the crime of interference with business, and even if it is for household affairs, it is merely an aiding and abetting act, and there was no intention that the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim at the time. Accordingly, the Defendant's act does not constitute the crime of interference with business, and the Defendant's act in this case does not constitute the crime of interference with business, and the judgment below
2. Determination
A. As to whether the crime of interference with business constitutes “comforcing force” under the crime of interference with business, the term “comforcing force” under the crime of interference with business is either tangible or intangible, as all forces capable of suppressing and mixing human free will. As such, violence, intimidation as well as social, economic and political status and pressure by royalty, etc. are included therein, and in reality, it is not required that the victim’s free will will be restricted (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2009Do5698, Oct. 13, 201; 2009Do5732, Sept. 10, 2009). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, when several women prevent the main entrance into the construction site of this case, put them back, put them back, put them back, and then cut back to them, and then, they can use them back to the cement at the time of their delivery.