If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On January 18, 2018, at around 02:08, the Defendant: (a) damaged the above patrol vehicle to be used by public offices in order to reach the right side of the 103-dong apartment unit B in Busan, the 103-dong, and (b) caused the Defendant to pay the taxi fee to the staff of the patrol vehicle E-car patrol vehicle in the science and technology police station, which was called after receiving a report on the problem of the c and D taxi fare; (c) caused the Defendant to pay the taxi fee without entering the Defendant’s horse; and (d) caused the h patrol box, which is a case for public use, one time to drinking on his own right side; and (d) caused the utility of the goods used by public offices by damaging the above patrol vehicle so that the knick, which is attached on the front left side of the knife of the knife on the right side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police in relation to C and G;

1. Reporting on investigation results and investigation reports;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to eight photographs;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although there was a record of punishment several times due to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the crime of destroying property, the fact that the defendant has caused the instant crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in light of all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the defendant, the fact that the defendant has committed a crime, the acceptance of the patrol car damaged at his own expense, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record of being punished beyond his/her own expense, etc., and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, career, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as set forth in the arguments in this case shall be determined as per the text.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 18, 201.02:18, the Defendant was unable to wear a check-up with the arrest of a flagrant offender within the H District located in the Busan Seo-guJ; and (b) on the grounds that C and C’s family K and two other persons were considered.