When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 21, 2013, at least 10:30, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing 70,000 won, even though he/she knew of the fact that, at least 10,000 won, the market value of the victim C was stolen by B from 460-26 the new forest basin located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Guro-gu, 460-26, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing 70,000 won, even though he/she knew of the fact that the victim’s market value was KRW 5,60,000,000,000,000,000 won, in the victim’s market value owned by Samsung G.

2. At around 10:30 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at KRW 1.30,000,00, even though he/she knew that the market value of the victim F owned by B stolen from B was 90,000,000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol of the police against B, and statement of each police officer against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on closure data;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.