A. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a car to turn to the left on the front of the entrance of the modern apartment located in Daejeon Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and brought about a danger of collision with the city bus going to the left at the opposite part; (b) in the course of a dispute with the victim D (the age of 45) who gets off and get off the car; and (c) in the course of a dispute with the driver D (the age of 45) who was going to the city bus, the Defendant again carried the said car, which is a dangerous object after getting aboard the said car, carried the bridge of the victim who was in the front of the vehicle, and got on the bridge of the victim who was in the front of the vehicle for about two weeks medical treatment.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim by dangerous things.

B. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a CA car at the front of the entrance of the modern apartment located in Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, to turn to the left; and (b) there was a risk of collision with the city bus going to the left at the opposite part; (c) the Defendant was in the course of having a dispute with the victim D(45 years old); (d) again, the Defendant was on board the said vehicle and driving the said vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and was on the bridge of the victim in front of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim with dangerous things.

2. The summary of the argument is merely a mistake by wrong operation of the passenger vehicle operation system, and the defendant did not commit an injury or assault to the victim.

3. Determination

A. The evidence presented by the prosecutor alone proves that the defendant had an intentional injury or assault to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant had an intentional injury or assault

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(b) Results of the jury's verdict 1) Not guilty of primary facts charged: Seven persons (in unanimous verdict) not guilty of primary facts charged: Seven persons (in unanimous verdict).

4. According to the conclusion, this case.