When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 29, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Changwon District Court’s territorial branch.

On July 5, 2020, at around 21:00, the Defendant driven D Ap-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statements of drinking drivers;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports and summary order-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant, even though he/she had a record of criminal punishment due to a drunk driving, has driven an alcoholic beverage again, and such risk is high.

However, the defendant seems to have an attitude that the defendant would not drive under the influence of alcohol again while reflecting his fault in depth, the defendant's consciousness also appeal that the defendant will not drive under the influence of alcohol, and there is no other penalty power than before the judgment, and the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the various factors of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and the fact that the blood alcohol concentration of this case has not been relatively high.