The defendant shall pay 6,00,000 won to the applicant for compensation.

[2016 Highest 1609] On February 26, 2016, the Defendant introduced a person who is working in a military unit but will work for the victim C at the seat of Pyeongtaek-si Eup, Pyeongtaek-gu, Seoul.

The term "to be employed in the military unit" was referred to as "to be employed by the small father who is the principal of the job security."

However, the defendant did not have a small father working in the military unit, and even if he received the money in the name of the membership deposit from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to get the injured party employed in the military unit.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, 700,000 won in cash from the damaged person's place, and 80,000 won in cash from the No. D's account on the 26th of the same month, and

3. The same month:

7. Two million won for the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of D, and the same month.

8. A total of KRW 500,000,000 and KRW 6 million,00,000,000,000 for the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of D and the 10th of the same month, respectively, was acquired through deception

[2016 Highest 1664] On July 28, 2015, the Defendant concluded a CCTV installation contract with the victim G at the F convenience store located in Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do. On July 28, 2015, the Defendant made an investment of KRW 4 million in the U.S. military unit. The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that half of the profits would be KRW 33.5 million.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay 33,50,000 won to the victim because he did not have been under the CCTV installation contract in the military unit.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving 4 million won in cash from the victim as the investment money, received 7 million won in total from around that time to August 12, 2015 as the investment money, and acquired it by deceiving 7 million won in total from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the prosecution and the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to C and G

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.