However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:20 on March 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.165% from the front day of the “Thopy House” in the original city-based phase to the unstring distance in the original city-based city.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On March 2, 2015, at around 00:20, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was in a state of difficulty in normal driving due to the influence of drinking, such as smelling in the entrance, red and heavy snowing, but the Defendant driven the said vehicle and proceeded to the intersection of the “free distance” at the port of the joint office to turn to the left.

Since signal lights are installed on the front side of that place, in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce speed to persons engaged in driving cars and to prevent accidents in advance by living well the movement of other vehicles in the signal lights and the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to turn to the left at the stop signal, was faced with the front part of the victim D(the age of 44)'s Ethp vehicle operated by the victim D(the age of 44) who was under his influence according to the driving signal, and the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim F, who was on the part of the victim's Mati Vehicle on the part of the victim's D driving, such as the left-hand body fellle, etc., which requires approximately 13 weeks of treatment, and the victim G (22 years of age) who was on the part of the defendant's driving, who was on the part of the victim's driver's car, for about 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1.