However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 18, 2013, the Defendant signed and sealed the Defendant’s pro-friendly B’s name in the criminal charge of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-dong 618-1 Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station and the criminal 3 team office’s statement letter column.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged B’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, issued the forged private signature to the Seoul Mapo Police Station criminal and the police officer as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers against B and the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the place of criminal offense;

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1)