If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 18, 2012, the Defendant submitted a lien report to the effect that “A concludes a sales contract for neighborhood living facilities located in D and D on February 17, 2010 and carries out the renovation and repair works of the said building, but it is reported that the Defendant is exercising the lien until he pays KRW 130 million of the renovation and repair costs due to the circumstances of the debtor and the owner of the building,” with respect to the auction case of the said court C in the Youngcheon District Court, Youngcheon District Court, the Defendant filed a lien report with F.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any such improvement and repair work.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the fairness of auction by means of fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a real estate sales contract and sales contract to all matters to be registered;

1. Article 315 of the Criminal Act and Article 315 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;