2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. At around 15:00 on February 20, 2014, the Defendant was unable to resist about 30 minutes of the disturbance, including the Plaintiff’s operation and the Plaintiff’s extraction of all of the computer lines for business in the original city C Apartment D (hereinafter “instant childcare center”). On February 26, 2014, around 19:15, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,000 on July 28, 2014 and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

B. In addition, on March 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million on April 2, 2015 in the instant childcare center, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million on April 2, 2015 in the instant childcare center, in which 83 items, including air conditioners and washing machines, other than laundry and washing machines, owned by the Plaintiff, were brought to a seller of used goods (hereinafter “damage”).

(Grounds for recognition: Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the whole purport of the pleading

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s main defense

A. As to the lawsuit of this case for which the plaintiff sought a total of 38,949,200 won for tort damages against each of the cases listed in the above paragraph (1) (hereinafter “each of the tort of this case”), against the defendant (i.e., property damage of the above Paragraph (b) KRW 32,849,200 for consolation money of KRW 6,00,000 for consolation money of KRW 32,849,200 for damages as stated in the above Paragraph (b), the

B. Therefore, the following circumstances, i.e., solatium No. 2014p. 5060 among the Defendant, which can be seen by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, i.e., the statement in subparagraphs 1 through 8 and the overall purport of the pleadings.