However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 1, 2014, at around 02:50 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant 105-1, at the packaging end of the “Yaeaeaea” 105-1, the Defendant 105-1, a middle school dong c (34 years of age) drinking together with drinking together, and divided conversations with each other. There is a conflict between opinions, which is an object dangerous to the table of the dispute, one time with the left face of the victim, and cut back the back face of the victim one time with a beer, which is a dangerous object, and then, cut off the number of back of the victim one time and takes approximately two weeks of treatment for approximately 2 weeks, the Defendant opened the depth and rear part (4m, 4m, 1cm, 5mth and lower part) of the front part (1cm, 4m, 1cm and lower part) and the rear part (1cm, 4m, 1cm and lower part).

(A) If six months have elapsed after the primary furnal operation, plere-rheat and plere-mal marry may be conducted. Summary of evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the criminal defendant has committed an aggressive crime in depth and that the criminal defendant has paid medical expenses to the victim and agreed to do so);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Concurrent consideration of the grounds for reduction of punishment);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;