A. On or around the beginning of March 2014, the Plaintiff sought to the C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office operated by the Defendant whether a house can be leased by obtaining a lease loan, and the Defendant, while soliciting the lease of a house No. 202 among the two-story housing and neighborhood living facilities located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant house”), who was aware of the Plaintiff, provided a telephone call to F, informed the loan consultant F of the amount of the Plaintiff’s health insurance premium, and asked him of whether it is possible to grant the loan.

B. F notified the Defendant that there was no goods that the Plaintiff could receive a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a bank. The Defendant asked F to inquire into whether the loan of another financial institution is possible, and F asked G to inquire of the lending consultant dealing with the loan of the Nonghyup Bank, and answer the Defendant that the Nonghyup Bank could obtain a loan to the Defendant.

C. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant solicited the Plaintiff to rent the instant house while granting a loan for the deposit, and the Plaintiff, as a broker of the Defendant, concluded a lease contract with D with respect to the instant house, which was concluded between KRW 240,000,000 and the contract period from April 21, 2014 to April 20, 2016 (hereinafter “the lease contract of this case”), and paid KRW 20,000,000 to D deposit.

According to the instant lease contract, the Plaintiff paid D the remainder of KRW 220,000,000 out of the deposit for the deposit for the deposit on April 21, 2014, and D was to return the down payment to the Plaintiff in cases where D actively cooperates with the Plaintiff’s loan for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit and it is impossible for D to move into due to the lack of cooperation.

E. However, the Plaintiff failed to obtain a loan of lease on a deposit basis by April 21, 2014, which is the remaining payment date, and the Plaintiff extended a loan to D on or around April 21, 2014 on the condition that the Plaintiff established a right to lease on a deposit basis with respect to the instant house according to the Defendant’s proposal.