1. The Defendant of assaulted on March 20, 2016: (a) around 23:50, the victim D (67) located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, for drinking alcohol and food at the “E” restaurant; and (b) received a request from the victim to pay the food cost from the victim.

“In doing a bath theory, the victim intending to drink the victim’s drinking and to erobbbbate it, and assaulted the victim by breath’s hand.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, around 23:55 on the same day, and after receiving the report referred to in the preceding paragraph D’s 112, and was called out, G in the circumstances belonging to the F District District of the Seoul Nowon Police Station, Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, with G’s arm’s length to pay food to the Defendant, and was s

“To the end,” and to the end, the left part of G was assaulted twice.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch and treatment of police officers' 112 reported cases.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods by assaulting the police officer G at the time, at a place specified in paragraph 2, and the police officer G, put his cell phone (SHW-E250S) on his hand, which was used by HW-E250S in Seoul Nowon-gu Seoul Nowon Police Station, which was called together with G, to operate a Kameras for the business purpose of the Kameras and recorded the said site on his hand, and caused the above public cell phone to fall down on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the public cell phone for business use, which is a case of public property, to the amount of KRW 115,455.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness G and H;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to D;

1. A copy of the work log and the list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each image and repair estimate of receipts and damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 (1), Article 141 (1), and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor) of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes are the head of a restaurant that demands food costs.