However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 27, 2017, the Defendant driving a CK5 car around 17:02, and continued to drive a cK5 car in the front of the “E cafeteria” set forth in D at the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to see the signal of the front line and safely proceed with the straight line prior to the direct exhaustion of the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and went on to the left side of the direction-hand side of the motor vehicle in the madle, by negligence in the course of an intersection in violation of the signal.

The F(74)'s failure to drive the F(74) 550CC PALARS caused the collision between the Defendant's front part and the Defendant's front part. The F(74)'s failure to drive 550CC PALARS caused the collision between the Defendant's front part and the Pla

G-owned HM5 Motor Vehicles shocked a part behind the HM5 Motor Vehicle, and caused it to be kid among them.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F in the above occupational negligence, such as the 10-day treatment of approximately 10 weeks, the amount and the mouth of the right satisfaction, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. G statements;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses and the following inquiry;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines / [the scope of the recommended sentence / [the scope of the recommendation] general traffic accident class 1 (the injury of traffic accidents) [the person subject to special sentencing : In the event of serious injury, the mitigated area where illegality in Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is heavy: Where the victim was at considerable negligence in the occurrence of traffic accidents or the expansion of damage (the victim's unauthorized driving) and the victim was not subject to punishment 2.