beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.04.25 2013구합2725

부정수급 및 지원금 반환처분

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 19, 2009, the Plaintiff, a company established by North Korean defectors B for the purpose of job creation business for vulnerable groups (North Korean defectors) through waste recycling business, entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the support period as of June 22, 2009 to December 21, 2009, and subsequently renewed the said agreement on November 27, 2009 and June 16, 2010 on two occasions.

The representative of an executing institution (social enterprise certification number) representative and the reasons for disposition of the details of the disposition (violation of violation) of the details of the disposition of the address: B address: The address of the Gu and the Gu (122,66,910 won) by submitting a false document and submitting a false document to cancel the certification of a social enterprise job creation project (amount returned: 122,66,910 won).

B. On July 19, 2013, the Defendant rendered the following dispositions against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 18 of the former Social Enterprise Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 11275, Feb. 1, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Articles 30 and 31 of the Subsidy Management Act (hereinafter “Subsidy Management Act”), on the ground that the Plaintiff unlawfully received the subsidies for the creation of social jobs, the Defendant applied for reexamination of the amount of the subsidies during the initial contract period (hereinafter “instant disposition”), the total amount of KRW 122,66,910,00 for the subsidies to be returned (hereinafter “instant disposition”), and the total amount of subsidies to be returned, KRW 122,66,910,00 for the first contract period (from June 22, 2009 to December 21, 2009).

【Fact-finding, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6, and 7 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case in this case contains any of the following serious and obvious defects, thus seeking confirmation of its invalidity.

1. Article 18 of the Social Enterprise Promotion Act shall apply to the cancellation of the certification of a social enterprise.