However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 2, 2011, the Defendant, as a person to be called the public duty personnel call, failed to respond to the call from the date when three days have elapsed since the call-up of the director general of the regional military manpower office in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-dong as of April 11, 201, to the public duty personnel call from the defendant's house located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-dong as of April 11, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes to file an accusation against public duty personnel call and receipt of notice;

1. The main sentence of Article 88 (1) 1 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination of punishment as ordered in light of the fact that the first case is the case where the defendant did not respond to the call-up of the defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, and the defendant expressed his intention to handle matters relating to military service through normal procedures without repeating the same crime again;