When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a public official (Grade VI) belonging to the Sin Chang-si Environmental Waterworks Department and D, who is appointed as a supervisor for construction works for the E-construction project ordered by the Sin Chang-si Office and is in charge of supervision over the overall construction works.

[Te. 20 on May 20, 2016] Defendant 1: (i) was awarded the said electrical construction by means of an electronic bid by (NG) G in South Won-si; (ii) was awarded a successful bid by means of an electronic bid; (iii) around May 20, 2016, the public prosecution, the representative of the said G, who was a representative of the said G, was sent a telephone to H; and

was made.

The Defendant, at around 12:10 on the same day, asked H to give a subcontract for the said electrical construction to other electricity companies at the front of “J cafeteria” located in the former Northern-gun I, and then, I will proceed with construction directly by H.

In other words, the defect ‘satisfy' has been put on the basis of the defect.

It is necessary to keep money more.

In that time, I have returned to the summer leave, and whether or not I have to take a fluorous test for larceny.

I would like to make you pay money to the construction work directly or directly regardless of whether you will give the subcontract.

It means to request H to pay money to H, which means that H does not listen well to the amount required by the suspect, and is called as “Icheon,00,000 won” and “Icheon,” while speaking as “K CC Easts to have attempted to receive KRW 30 million at the first time.” It is so called that I will talk about this0 million won only on the ground that H would have attempted to receive KRW 30 million at the first time.

“......”

Then, the Defendant carried out the aforementioned electrical construction as if he could perform the additional construction through a design modification, and said that “if an additional construction is made, 10% of the price would be changed.”

[Judgment of May 24, 2016] On May 24, 2016, the Defendant continued to divide H with the above G office located in the Namwon-si F around May 24, 2016. The Defendant calls to the M of the L Design Office in charge of supervision of the said electrical construction, and the phone calls to the M of the L Design Office in charge of supervision of the said electrical construction, and there is no need to show a match supervision, which is the president, who is well aware of the inside of the supervision, and then only the final documents are included. The supervision is being