However, the defendant A for a period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. 피고인 A, D, I의 공모범행 (2013. 8. 27. 서울 양천구 O에 있는 P 병원 앞 고의사고 보험 사기) 피고인 A, D, I은 고의 교통사고를 일으킨 후 보험금을 편취할 것을 공모하고, 2013. 8. 27. 13:50 경 서울 양천구 O에 있는 P 병원 앞 도로에서, 피고인 D은 Q 아우 디 A5 승용차를 운전하다가 정차하고, 피고인 A는 R BMW120D 승용차를 운전하여 위 아우 디 승용차의 바로 뒤에 정차하면서 클락션과 깜박이로 신호를 보내고, 피고인 I은 S 아반 떼 승용차를 운전하여 피고인 A 운전의 BMW 승용차를 고의로 들이받고, 순차로 피고인 D의 아우 디 승용차를 들이받는 3 중 연쇄 추돌 사고를 냈다.

Since then, Defendant A, D, and I received automobile accident insurance from the victim (Gu) LIG damage insurer, and obtained 11,345,410 won from the victim company as the name of the non-repair cost of the automobile and the hospital treatment cost.

2. The Defendant A, B, and D’s conspiracy (the intentional accident insurance fraud in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan, on September 8, 2013), through which the Defendant A, B, and D conspireds to obtain insurance proceeds after causing a traffic accident. The Defendant A proposed a specific plan for the crime of insurance fraud to the Defendant B, B, and D following the implementation of the crime. Defendant B and D proposed a specific plan for the crime of insurance fraud, around September 15:20, 2013, Defendant B and D stopped C driving a vehicle of s60 vehicles on the Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, U.S., and Defendant D caused an accident that caused the instant B’s automobile intentionally caused the B’s automobile to be driven.

Since then, Defendant A, B, and D received automobile accident insurance from the same fire insurance company in the same department as the damaged person, and received 58,335,650 won as the repair cost of the automobile and the hospital treatment expenses.

3. Defendants A, F, G, H, and E’s criminal conduct (the Defendant’s intentional insurance fraud in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu Seoul High-gu, Seocho-gu Seoul High-gu Office on December 4, 2013), Defendant A, F, G, H, and E.