However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On July 8, 2016, at around 01:20, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to d's f's body in front of the C convenience store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, and 112 reported to 112; and (b) expressed that he was a plastic f's body in front of the C convenience store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, by F's circumstances and circumstances leading up to the E-district belonging to the Gwangju Mine Police Station E-gu, and by G; and (c) expressed a desire to d' f's body in hand, “F's f's f's f's f's f's f'.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [decision of the types of recommendations] the scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of the scope of recommendations] the basic area [decision of the scope of recommendations] 6 months to 1 year and 4 months; and

2. Determination of sentence: Determination of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months (two years of suspended sentence), taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime and circumstances after the crime, shall be made as ordered.

Unfavorable circumstances: When the defendant called to the site to use violence against a police officer on duty after having received a report that he/she assaults another person, the case is not easy in that the defendant interfered with the proper performance of national functions and caused the waste of police power that should be concentrated on the investigation of crime.

The favorable circumstances: The degree of violence is difficult to be considered to be more serious as the body of police officers is closely involved in several times.

There is no record of punishment for the same crime and there is no record of punishment for violence crime for the last ten years.

The confession and mistake of the crime are made.