However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive against Defendant A.

From the beginning of July 2015 to July 23, 2015, the Defendants: (a) installed 8 rooms of Defendant A and shower facilities in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) provided female employees, including E, with a total of 80,00 won from customers while operating sexual traffic establishments; (c) provided female employees, including E, with the sexual desire of customers, and (d) provided scams under the above conditions; and (b) provided the said employees with an explanation of the type of business to customers, while serving as employees of the said establishments, Defendant B provided them with an explanation of the type of business.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each lease contract;

1. Relevant Articles and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service Defendant A: The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendations) [the grounds for the sentencing of the defendant] [the grounds for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendations] [the grounds for the sentencing of the crime subject to the age of 19 years or older, the mediation of commercial sex acts, etc. (the mediation of commercial sex acts by the receipt and payment of business fees, etc.)] and the basic area (the decision of the sentence] [the defendant A]]. The defendant A was sentenced to the suspended sentence for six months (the 2 years of suspended execution (the crime of this case is not good, but the defendant would not repeat again while he is contrary to the nature of the crime of this case], and the defendant B was sentenced to the sentence of this case by taking full account of all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, living environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.).