However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On January 18, 2017, from around 21:00 to around 21:15 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the business by having the victim dismissed the Defendant who was working at the D hotel in the name of “D hotel” located in the Gunsan City operated by the victim B, and had the victim who was working at the D hotel and was in reporting the knter business under the influence of alcohol, it was difficult for the Defendant to avoid advertising with a large voice, such as “hing, eating out, leaving out of the knife, leaving the knife, leaving the knife, and prohibiting advertising.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's accommodation business by force.

2. On January 18, 2017, at the place indicated in paragraph 1 at around 21:15, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, as in paragraph 1, to a slope F of the Gunsan Police Station Emba, called out after receiving the report of 112 from B, and called out, “I see why she would have her her friend, she would have her her friend, and she would have her her friend, she

Doctrine Doctrine

As the word "", the balthm balp fats were debrised with bals.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to B or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV images to the extent that such photographs are to be damaged;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of business, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence are as follows: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] ; Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution ; Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (the scope of the recommended punishment ; six months to one year and six months); and Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (the scope of the recommendation punishment ; the scope of the recommendation ; the scope of the recommendation ; the scope of the recommendation ; the scope of the punishment ; the basic area (the scope of the recommendation ; the obstruction of the performance of public duties;