When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a patient who has been in the emergency department of the hospital B, and the victim C is a medical officer and employee.

On March 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) exercised authority on March 23:15, 2019, prior to the night office and the reception counter of the hospital B, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s preparation of electric source documents, receipt of medical expenses, etc., by using force on several occasions, such as spackers, sick spackers, grow down spackers, or swine spacks,” or “dypacks, in accordance with the principle of good faith.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the investigation report (CCTV image attachment);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;