2.Provided, That the execution of imprisonment shall be postponed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 05:30 on October 3, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim with a large sound, such as “I will see that “I will not interfere with work while any male desire,” and “I will see that I will see that I will see the victim as “I will see that I will interfere with work and will return home,” and “I will see that I will see that I will see that I will see that I will see you will see, she will fright, fright, bitch, bitch, bitch.”

2. Although the Defendant received a demand from the police officers to present identification cards with a warning that he may be arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult at the time, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant refused such demand and continued to engage in an insulting act and arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, and thereby obstructing the police officers’ legitimate performance of duties, such as control of the crime, by assaulting only one-time on the right part of the E, for which the Defendant was arrested.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the F’s complaint, statement in the police station against F;

1. Entry in the police statement of E, entry in G, and application of the Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the consideration of the fact that a person commits a crime and commits a mistake);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;